We, Frei Betto, Atilio Borón, Bernard Cassen, Adolfo Perez Esquivel, Federico Mayor,
Riccardo Petrella, Ignacio Ramonet, Emir Sader, Boaventura Santos, Roberto Savio, Aminata
Traoré, are the signatories of the Declaration of Porto Alegre, in the WSF of 2005. We have
lost since then wonderful friends (Samir Amin, Eduardo Galeano, Samuel Ruiz Garcia,
Francois Houtart, Josè Saramago, Immanuel Wallertsein). But we have shared a lot with them,
and we are convinced of what they would think today. Those we are still alive have decided to
send this message to the WSF, to provide one more element of stimulus and reflection. The
spirit of our initiative is well represented by the message of participation to the initiative,
written by the Peace Nobel Prize, Adolfo Perez Esquivel: “Thanks for the initiative to revive
the hope and the strength of the WSF. For some time, we have been thinking of something
similar, to find again paths that would identify us with the diversity in thinking and in actions,
to face the challenges of our time. Dear brothers, I join my signature, and I give you a warm
Is the World Social Forum, which celebrates its 20th anniversary in 2021, just an open
space or can it (should it) also be a space for action? This question has been discussed for years
in the WSF International Council, and so far, it has not been possible to reach a conclusion.
At the Porto Alegre WSF, back in 2005, a few of us launched the “Porto Alegre
Manifesto” voicing concern about the growing marginalisation of the WSF on the global stage.
We knew that this broke the Forum’s rule against making declarations, but we felt that this
would be a way to contribute the rich debates at Porto Alegre, to international politics. The
following year, the “Bamako Call” was issued in a similar vein. Neither of these calls received
a response.
Fifteen years on, our concerns were shown to be quite real. The Forum began in 2001,
thanks to the generous and visionary work of the Brazilian group and the support they then
received during Lula’s presidency. Progressive internationalisation brought the WSF to every
continent. The idea of opening a space for social movements, and for critical intellectuals
exchanging experiences and ideas, to dispute the hegemony of neoliberalism, was a
revolutionary one. This had a significant global impact. Contravening the threat of a US war
against Iraq, the WSF demonstrated its immense potential by calling for massive, globally
coordinated marches to reject the war. However, these kinds of initiatives were not continued.
Unfortunately, even now, almost two decades later, the WSF has not accepted any change
to its rules or practices. The idea of an open space, impeded from interacting with the outside
world as a global political actor, left the Forum as a marginal player. It is no longer a point of
reference. In recent years at least three major popular movements have mobilized millions
across the globe: the fight against climate change, for gender equality, and against racism. In
these, as a global collective actor, the WSF has been completely absent. However the founding
idea of the WSF, to combat neoliberalism from a holistic vision (and in a non-sectoral manner)
has lost neither its strength nor its validity. The same goes for the WSF’s struggles against
colonialism and the patriarchy, and calling for the respect of nature and of the commons.
Action is required. The world has changed, and not for the better. Today, not only do we
face the devastating consequences of forty years of neoliberal capitalism, we are also
dominated by the financial markets and threatened by rapid climate change which could make
human life on Earth impossible. Mass poverty and growing inequality divide our societies, as
do racism and discrimination.
Resistance is also growing. In 2019 we have seen an overwhelming surge in movements,
mainly from youth, in many major cities around the world. They know that the old world is
dying, and they’re impatient to build another just and peaceful world, where all men and
women are equal, conserving nature and with an economy subservient to society’s needs. They
are preparing many alternatives, but they lack a space in which they can come together, to
create common global narratives, based on grassroots experiences, capable of driving future
actions. Progressive activists and academics are so fragmented that they not only risk just losing
the battle, but also the war.
COVID-19 is yet another crisis, albeit one that for the first time affects everyone
simultaneously, although not with the same intensity. The world has become a village, one in
which we are all interdependent. Never before has it been so clear that we must, in fact, act,
and we must do it together. The World Social Forum still has significant potential to give voice
to these movements, to help them put their alternatives in a global context and allow these new
conversations and practices to converge. For this reason, we who have participated in the WSF
since its inception, who have signed the declarations of Porto Alegre and Bamako, are calling
for a “renewed World Social Forum”. We face a multidimensional global crisis; local, national
and global actions are required, with all the necessary articulation between these levels. The
WSF is the ideal framework to encourage action. That is what this initiative is all about.